Now consider the cry of those who fight vehemently to keep their choice in music on, regardless of others. What’s their problem? They say it helps them make it through the day. Consider the person who can’t stand their choice, what does it do to that person? Doesn’t that which helps the one, equally tear down the other? They demand to build themselves up, claiming they have to have it, at the cost of another. They can’t make it without the uplift, so are willing to tear another down. Does this not spell “addiction”? A kind of drug stimulant to make it through the day? Should one man’s drug addiction be catered to at the expense of those who operate in the historical norm with peace. Addictions usually take on the form of increasing in greater levels. Take alcohol as an example. He who drinks beer all the time can down more than his physical match who has never had a drink in his life. Would any reasonable person feel the freedom to force the non-drinker to drink the same amount of beers as the drinker, until the drinker had had his fill. Would any reasonable person give the non-drinker the option of, “you drink those beers or you’re out of a job!” Such is the common state of many places of employment. If listening to some music is so important to some, doesn’t that tell you that it has gotten out of control. They can’t handle working without it. Strange, mankind had gotten along pretty well for several millennia without “canned” music. |